Most doctors who treat OA rarely use prolotherapy Austin. The method, which involves injecting a liquid substance directly into the joint, has shown promising results. However, research has been inconsistent. In the case of saline-based prolotherapy, patients reported a significantly lower level of pain after the procedure than those who received dextrose-based prolotherapy. While there are some possible reasons for the results, these reasons may not be conclusive enough to recommend it as a treatment for OA.
Although the mechanism of action of prolotherapy is not yet fully understood, there are some promising outcomes. In a study published in the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, a group of 13 participants experienced a reduction in pain after the procedure. Researchers suggest that this is due to the fact that the treatment stimulates the release of growth factors in the body that promote the natural healing process. However, some experts believe that the pain relief is a placebo effect.
Prolotherapy is considered safe for most people and can be performed in a primary care setting. It can be administered in a physician's office and is not regulated by the FDA. Regardless of the benefits, prolotherapy is not without its risks. Studies on the safety and effectiveness of this treatment have shown that it is effective in reducing pain and swelling. But because this procedure uses needles, many doctors are skeptical. It is important to choose a licensed medical professional who has extensive training and experience in this technique.